I’m not sure how to reply to this without falling into misunderstandings and all that. AKB is the main idol group right now, and whether you like it or not, and they, somehow, shape how the image of idols, the discourse, ways to communicate with their audience, media and marketing strategies, conversations and expectations about them are understood. So yes, of course, LinQ are molded on that shape.
But, they also bring their own spin on that model of doing things. To use an example: The Beatles was a massive and successful pop group. They have a drummer, two guitars and a bass player. You could argue that, every pop or rock group using that line-up, somehow are copycats. Even if The Beatles didn’t invent that group formation or certainly, that many, many groups did lots of different things with it. Is an argument that annoys me: men are under the influence or they react to it, women only copy other women. AKB have been a very important group on my life, and I still respect it, but really can’t tell you how annoying are comparisons with them. Mostly because they are pointless, unfair or really throwing their name around is to make the guy speaking some kind of expert when he is usually only is hot air or only is throwing shit around. On those type of pages based on 2ch that talk about gravure idols, you can always expect that somebody downthread, will point something about AV. The only surprise is how soon or late it will come. The AKB comparisons are something like these.
I’m not saying that you are doing this or not saying that it is a pointless thing to do (as I have tried to do on the first paragraph), but, in the way they are usually done are just a way of ignoring whatever qualities or virtues the “copycat” idol group have on their own. A way to transcend it to talk about “the BIG things”. Standard internet fare, dreams of intellectual grandeur, boring, things to ignore. Maybe the point is interesting in the end, and the conversation worth having, but somehow they have to surpass these fences.
---