TNA News: Hulk Hogan responds to criticism that TNA looks like "WCW 2000," addresses hardcore wrestling fans critical of TNA's direction
By James Caldwell, Torch assistant editor
Hulk Hogan responded to criticism that TNA's TV product currently looks like "WCW 2000" on last night's Rob Van Dam radio show by saying TNA management and Spike TV are trying to determine which wrestlers are ratings draws and which wrestlers have no drawing power.
Hogan said they're "trying to find the bridge" in a so-called transition phase from the old, recognizable names to the new crop of stars by throwing as much against the wall to see what sticks on a minute-by-minute basis.
"What we're doing is we've been at it about a month now and we're trying to make a transition. I didn't want to come in as the red and yellow Hulk Hogan doing the clown act. What I tried to do was basically bump the number," Hogan said in response to a caller who was critical of TNA bringing in old stars. "We're watching the show minute by minute. We see when A.J. Styles comes on, where it jams. We see where Scott Hall comes on, where it jams. We see where Hulk Hogan's on and it spikes. We're going through the learning process. What we need to do with these young guys is breathe life into the characters."
Hogan continued: "We're throwing a bunch of stuff against the wall, seeing what spikes the needle minute by minute, and learning as we go along that some guys have no life at all and some guys have a lot of life. We're already maneuvering all the players around. You're going to see who we're going with more than others. You're going to see who we're really giving the super rocket up their rear end."
Asked why he keeps putting himself on TV so much, Hogan played his "aw-shucks" self-deprecation card before basically saying he can't argue against the ratings jumping when he appears on-camera.
"If I'm on the TV too much, I'm pulling myself off. I don't need to walk my crippled ass down that ramp," Hogan said. "I'm not about being on TV, but for some reason, the last four weeks when I've been coming out doing the transition stuff, the needle spiked a little bit."
Hogan also defended TNA's direction against generalized criticism about TNA's direction from hardcore wrestling fans who follow pro wrestling on the Internet or in wrestling newsletters, such as the Torch. Hogan again played the self-deprecation card that he hasn't been smartened up to the business, especially dealing with a TV network, so how could anyone question what they're doing in TNA.
"All these people you call the smart marks and I've been in the business 30 years and I'm still a mark. I'm not smartened up yet, brother. All of a sudden, people are saying, 'Why are you doing this and why are you doing that?' Do the marks know about the network - what Kevin Kay and Brian Diamond at Spike are asking and demanding? There's a whole 'nother world out there that all these people have an opinion on who's on TV too much, but they don't know what's happening with the network.
"I'm on a whole 'nother arena more than dealing with a finish or putting RVD on TV. The network might want RVD on TV less or more. They might want RVD on TV all the time or not at all. There's a lot of things that I'm having to deal with that I never had to deal with in the past.
"This is a big universe and I'm listening to everyone. She (the caller critical of TNA's direction) makes a very valid point and believe me I don't want to be on TV all the time. I like to be in the back and think of stuff and listen to everyone's ideas. That's where I'm having fun. I think if I were to drop the leg again, I would never get up again."
Hogan also gave an explanation for bringing in the Nasty Boys to TNA: "The Nasty Boys - I love them because I believe they can give 3D a run."
Caldwell's Analysis: Nasty Boys and "run" aren't in the same sentence very often. Knobs was blown up just cutting his promo on Team 3D last week on Impact. See below for video evidence if you need a reminder. (To give TNA credit, though, they did a fine job selling the mass audience on a tag match that could be the trainwreck of the century.)
Regarding Hogan's three-paragraph defense above, it's interesting to note his defense was that he has to deal with network-types who want to see specific numbers in the ratings. Hogan didn't have an answer for 'Why are you doing this and why are you doing that?' from a creative standpoint. He simply "shifted the focus" onto drawing sympathy for having to deal with suits at the network. Hogan is making it sound like they're going to live-and-die on the creative ideas thrown against the wall until they settle into a consistent pattern once they figure out who's worth keep on the roster and who needs to go.
Topic: Official Wrestling Thread "Finally ... a wrestling thread HAS COME BACK TO JPH!P!!!" (Read 344716 times)