I never quite understood the popularity of "YouTube personalities", streamers, at the rest. What's the point? Why do people get boatloads of donations just for playing video games? Maybe graduate school isn't the answer.
It's an odd one, Youtube personalities are seen as the new front line for people to get information and opinions on games rather than traditional game websites. Chances are that if you find a Youtuber who shares the same likes and dislikes as you then you might pay more attention to a game that he or she says they enjoy. But there's a weird blurred line there between genuine endorsement and advertising from publishers which actually gives rise to genuine ethics in games journalism (see the example where Warner Bros was offering financial incentives to Youtubers if they spoke positively about Shadows of Mordor)
I will say that it also touches upon a classic gaming experience which is to play games with friends. I read someone putting forth the suggestion that as gaming moves more towards online multiplayer, you're getting more disconnected with actual human interaction and playing some games on the couch with your mates is slowly going away. But yet that is an intrinsic part of gaming, being able to share the experience as you fight a difficult boss or you are all scared to see what's around the corner. I've seen it mentioned that people view Youtubers in the same way, as you can see their reactions to those moments and share the experience in some way which can feel oddly removed and voyeuristic but for some it's as close as they can get to it nowadays. Whatever the reason it's here to stay, Pewdiepie is more popular than the most popular music artists like Beyonce on Youtube. It is definitely odd to think that people can get thousands if not hundreds of thousands in dollars from advertising and donations from just playing games, I'll agree. Me personally I do watch a few Youtubers but typically it's not to watch full let's plays of recent games (I'll probably play them anyway for myself so why spoil it), but to watch guys like Game Grumps or Two Best Friends Play put on an old game and play it for shits and giggles.
I watch most of the vids he posts on his youtube channel. His dry style is definitely not for everyone and he concentrates a lot on the tech specs, PC port quality etc, stuff that many don't find interesting. But he's mostly no-nonsense and only does PC stuff (which is the stuff I care about, so there's that as well). Outside of the vids though, I don't really keep up. I do remember him talking about how he was thinking about getting off twitter, though, haha. Sounds like it might be a good idea.
Looking at his comments outside the videos, he seems to have had his low moments, but I also remember a whole bunch of the stuff he's said has been taken out of context. I've never noticed any remarks of the sort you talk about in his videos, either. He's always seemed very pro-LGBT and his co-optional podcast (which I sometimes use as background noise) he does with a few other peeps had some transgender gaming personality as a guest just a while ago. As for gamergate and whatnot, he seems to be talking about the "right stuff", about journalistic transparency and all that jazz. But I usually zone out and try to find my happy place whenever the term "gamergate" is mentioned anywhere.
Transparency is a great thing, everyone should strive for it! But like GamerGate, he goes after the wrong targets. Game journalists, indie developers and feminist twitter personalities who slight him rather than big publishers who exert true power and influence over the industry. You don't hear the stupid shit he comes out with in his videos or podcasts because he's under Polaris, under ownership of Disney, which would react quite strongly if he said half the shit that he does on Twitter. Things like:
- Believing that women
'just don’t like certain genres of games' because of
'biology.' -
Saying that any kind of fiction with politics is 'regressive'-
Suggesting that racism doesn't exist in the UK-
Complaining about a videogame website covering a developer who donated $250k to a children’s hospital, saying “that’s what constitutes a game article on news sites these days.”. Because heaven forbid a positive news story on the gaming community is highlighted.
People can separate his off camera personality with what he does for Youtube and that's ok but for me personally, I know enough that I should just avoid and stay away.
Could it be Total Biscuit's British (Geordie to be precise) accent?
He has a good radio voice to be sure, but I think that's the only positive thing I have to say about him.
Last thing from GamerGate for a while I promise, this story was too good not to share. A few days ago, there was a GamerGate meet up in London and there was a writeup about it
here from a GamerGater and it was funny. Actually hard to believe it wasn't satire if not for the photo at the end with all round shitlord Nero. Few choice quotes here:
there were no raised voices and no fights.
...Well done?
Foie Gras. Foie Gras is a dish SJWs hate because they say it is cruel to the bird, which has to be force fed to maximise its liver size.
This reads as "I just bought overpriced goose liver while I drink theoretical SJW tears". Is this guy for real? Let it be forever known, that on 18/04/2015 a man ate Foie Gras to really hammer the nail against social justice. I think it's far more telling that they admit they're perfectly willing to support animal cruelty if it symbolically sticks it to those evil warriors.
Decent, wholesome British Apple Cider! Just the thing to celebrate our advances for ethical journalism!
This guy.
It occurs to me that a meetup like this would be a really good opportunity for some gaming and to share some products that are less in favour with the authoritarian left.
And yet there's no talk or sight of video games anywhere, just overpriced shit. I'd much rather pay £5 for Dominos, invite some friends and play Pro Evo. Maybe because I'm not compensating for anything by showing off all my overly expensive food.