JPHiP Forum

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Foxy Brown on September 23, 2005, 03:45:26 PM

Title: Vibrators fly off the shelves in Hong Kong pharmacies
Post by: Foxy Brown on September 23, 2005, 03:45:26 PM
With surveys showing Hong Kong men prefer work to sex, the city's women are seeking help with their love life from a pharmacy chain that has begun stocking sex toys alongside soap and shampoo. (http://www.mg.co.za/articlepage.aspx?area=/breaking_news/other_news/&articleid=251676)
Title: Vibrators fly off the shelves in Hong Kong pharmacies
Post by: Loki! on September 23, 2005, 03:54:00 PM
That's... quite something new. :o
Title: Vibrators fly off the shelves in Hong Kong pharmacies
Post by: TheQuickening on September 23, 2005, 05:02:30 PM
Dumb Hong Kong dudes don't know what they're missing.  What's cool is that the ladies can buy their "stuff" at a pharmacy!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

*Yes, I need this for my health.  It's a stress reliever. My endorphins aren't flowing as much as they should be.*
Title: Vibrators fly off the shelves in Hong Kong pharmacies
Post by: Foxy Brown on September 23, 2005, 05:39:55 PM
I need it for my neck and back pain. (http://www.shop.naturalhealthcaretoday.co.uk/product_info.php?products_id=273)
Title: Re: Vibrators fly off the shelves in Hong Kong pharmacies
Post by: Tuffty on September 23, 2005, 07:43:25 PM
Quote from: Boxy Brown
With surveys showing Hong Kong men prefer work to sex


Huh?! I thought that was impossible!!  :shock:
Title: Vibrators fly off the shelves in Hong Kong pharmacies
Post by: shadowstar on September 24, 2005, 05:25:05 AM
I think the main point here is that the men are choosing work over sex which is pure blasphemy! :lol:

how is that possible?
Title: Vibrators fly off the shelves in Hong Kong pharmacies
Post by: Asmodai on September 24, 2005, 06:52:44 AM
*Konno slides up next to me wearing a sexy negliée*

*Placing her hand on my chest she motions towards her the bed with her head*

Me: "Sorry honey, I'd rather do my case brief for South Staffordshire Water Co. v. Sharman [1896] 2 QB 44 (Eng)"

*Konno runs off crying*



No, I don't see it either.