Lawyer's Price For Missing Pants: $65 Million

[arun.yothin]

Pearson is gonna have to pay the Chungs' court costs and Judge Bartnoff said he'll decide later if Pearson will have to pay the Chungs' legal fees.

[mini*wheat]

I thought someone would actually update this by now

Well the case was "throw out." The judge of the case, not the idiot, says Satisfaction guarantee does not mean fulfilling outrages customer demands All I want now is the laundry owners to countersue the hell out of the judge/lawyer

I heard today that the laundry owners/their lawyers or whatever are trying to get silly judge/lawyer to pay the cost of them having to go to court for this nonsense because apparently, it was a whoooooole lot. And also, judge/lawyer is probably losing his job for being so ridiculous.

[nop]

wow such a good news for small business owner.  Hope they don't go back to Korea because of this bad customer.  Customer can be wrong too.

[Pinksheep]

I feel so sorry for the cleaners... bad luck...  $65 mil. just for a pair of pants... it's just stupid... -__-||

[frblckstr1]

CNN just reported they had to close there second cleaning shop, missed the rest of the text, something about emational stress? I'll bet. seems this is still going...

[kiikoi]

65$ million dollar pants hunt =D lol