hey guys/gals, can you all compare these 2 d-cameras for me and see which one you think is better?
1. Casio Z1050
2. Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2K (there is LX2 too, just that LX2K is the black version).
depends what sort of photography you plan on doing. i have the Leica D-LUX3 (Leica equivalent of the
DMC-LX2), and while it has some shortcomings, it's a very good camera for the type of photography i do.
the biggest difference is the image aspect ratio. the Casio is 4:3, while the Panasonic is 16:9. either way you could always crop the image to a different ratio, but depending on how often you want to take "standard" or "wide format" photos, one camera may be better than the other. many photographers consider the Panasonic to be an excellent 10mp 16:9 camera, and others to be excellent 10mp 4:3 cameras.
in terms of actual usage, you should consider how often you shoot photographs indoors, and how often you will be carrying around a tripod. as tempting as wide-format sounds with the Panasonic, the image sensor is very noisy for anything above ISO100. this means that if you take photos indoors, you'll either have to take a blurry image (or use a tripod) in order to keep good image quality, or else give up image quality to get a clear shot.
before you make any decisions, you should also know that if 16:9 wide-format isn't the most important choice, then you should also consider the
Canon Powershot G7 (albeit it's more expensive). it is considered by many photographers to be one of the best 10mp 4:3 cameras. besides superior image quality at up to ISO400 and above, the controls are much more refined, there's the possibility for attaching a flash unit, and much more. if you don't mind losing some pixels, this may end up being a better choice for you, since you can always crop your images down to 16:9.
i can't find a professional review (from dpreview.com) for the Z1050, probably because it's relatively new, so i can't vouch for or against it at the moment.